Oil Filter Question

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
datsun65
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1873
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 11:55 pm
Location: Texas
Model: 2000
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Oil Filter Question

Post by datsun65 »

Yesterday I bought two oil filters (1600/2000), at two different stores.

The one from the local Auto Zone was an STP brand ($2.99). The other was from Napa Auto Parts ($7.39). The diameter and seal on both the filters is he same, however, the filter from Napa was longer (about 1.5 inch) than the STP filter.

Should the differences between the two filters cause any concern? Have other folks run these brands?
Dan
Houston, TX
User avatar
impinhigh
Certified Roadster Nut
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Sunnyvale
Contact:

Post by impinhigh »

I'm running the STP right now, on this site is a link to "everything you ever wanted to know about oil filters" it says that the STP is made by a major filter manufacture, not sure which one but that it is a recommended filter. I think the Napa is also recommended.

Matt
User avatar
Minh
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2003 5:48 am
Location: Elk Grove, CA (near Sacramento)

Post by Minh »

If you think about if both filter were the same in all aspects except the height, the taller filter would be a better. The filter would a much larger filter surface therefore provid much more oil flow.

The Napa filters are manufactured made by WIC. They are good filters with a anti backflow valve re revent back flow of oil thus redepositing the filter particles back into the pan. It also keep the oil gallies full of oil so that at start up all the bearings are immediately lubricated.

It olny sucks when you change the filter because all the oil seeps back out because that backflow valve. Just be sure to have lots of rags when you change the filter.
'69 1982cc SU
'74 1600cc VW Bug
http://www.311s.org/registry/1969/srl311-07837.html
When life hands you lemons, ask for TEQUILA AND SALT!
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Post by spl310 »

Minh,

That is not always accurate. Some filters have less pleating, therefore less surface area. That could be true of the taller or shorter filters. Height does not always mean more area. Another thought is that the porosity (did I spell that right?) of the media will affect the filtration quality. That is why K&N filters do a worse job than paper filters until they get good and dirty. They let too much crap through that can cause damage. Someone on the Roadster list did a study for their work and they concluded that the gauze cloth (K&N type) filters would cost much more money than they would save due to the increased wear on the engines. But I am getting afield of the subject here.

The article referenced above is a great resource and it should give more details.
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
Post Reply