So, whether the front overriders stayed on has been debated in my mind for some time - Always thought it looked a bit too ‘busy’ up front. Mostly left them there because I didn’t want to deal with maybe having to rechrome it. Turns out, once i got them off, it wasn’t that bad.
85FA50BE-C078-4C8E-8F8E-6F24DA8D2B13.jpeg
Managed to clean the bumper up pretty well … and then as I was about to put it back on, I noticed something:
It looks almost ‘right’ without it
968F5580-CC52-469E-9C70-8E6555199306.jpeg
A dilemma ensued. Went out for a coffee to ponder … Didn't help. So, opinions welcome - Bumper (without overriders) on or off?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Bwk2000 on Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kai
Halifax, N.S. ‘69 SPL311 Sports 1600
Classic Cars - Because clean fingernails, free weekends, intact knuckles and financial stability are totally overrated.
Easy answer, Kai, if you don't mind the loss of protection the bumper provides: a bumper on that car would look as out of place as one on a BRE or a Bob Sharp roadster. Socks on a rooster!
I ran without the front bumper, for decades, but had to reinstall the cross bar (no overriders, ever) for NY 'safety' inspection, even though the bumper is below the 29" minimum specified height above the ground.
I’m not worried about not having a bumper up front. Nearest I can tell, all they do for our cars is add eight pounds - They would be less than useless in a collision (A couple small pieces of 1/16” pre-bent pig iron attached to an eight pound bumper isn’t going to absorb anything). Also, the center of my bumper was only 11 3/8” from the road, even my boot is higher than that … suppose a rabbit might be annoyed by the bumper a bit in a collision
This is definitely about aesthetics for me. I do like the basic simplicity of the bumpers (without overriders) as well. My chrome is decent so it’s not an eyesore. Hmmm …
Kai
Halifax, N.S. ‘69 SPL311 Sports 1600
Classic Cars - Because clean fingernails, free weekends, intact knuckles and financial stability are totally overrated.
rwmann wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:10 pm
I ran without the front bumper, for decades, but had to reinstall the cross bar (no overriders, ever) for NY 'safety' inspection, even though the bumper is below the 29" minimum specified height above the ground.
Minimum spec height 29 " what !
MO. Max height for middle of bumpers is 27" that's too high
Ya most all states safety equip that came with it has to be there
The whole point of the statute is to avoid a vehicle from running under it by keeping the bumper height low enough to stop it
Last edited by redroadster on Fri Aug 05, 2022 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Bumper Height Requirements
Owners of automobiles and pickup trucks are required to have both front and rear bumpers mounted within certain height levels. Height limitations are governed by the new shipping weight of the vehicle; not the modified or altered weight. The maximum allowable heights between the pavement and bottom of the front and rear bumper, as provided by Section 316.251, Florida Statutes, are:
Cars with a net weight of less than 2,500 pounds — 22 inches front and rear;
Cars 2,500 pounds or more but less than 3,500 pounds — 24 inches front and 26 inches rear;
Cars 3,500 pounds or more — 27 inches front; 29 inches rear;
Trucks under 2,000 — 24 inches front; 26 inches rear;
Trucks 2,000 pounds or more but less than 3,000 pounds — 27 inches front, and 29 inches rear;
Trucks 3,000 pounds or more but not more than 5,000 pounds — 28 inches front; 30 inches rear.
What are the minimums? Probably still higher than ours I would imagine.
I think some of those Max heights could pretty much drive right over me … most of me anyways.
Lol … Pretty sure the golf cart has a higher bumper than mine.
Kai
Halifax, N.S. ‘69 SPL311 Sports 1600
Classic Cars - Because clean fingernails, free weekends, intact knuckles and financial stability are totally overrated.
Agree with jhayden on your particular car. If you are going to do any autocrossing than the bumper might protect the whimpy valance from being damaged by a cone.
Mike M
Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!
1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!) 1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable!
rwmann wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:10 pm
I ran without the front bumper, for decades, but had to reinstall the cross bar (no overriders, ever) for NY 'safety' inspection, even though the bumper is below the 29" minimum specified height above the ground.
Minimum spec height 29 " what !
MO. Max height for middle of bumpers is 27" that's too high
Ya most all states safety equip that came with it has to be there
The whole point of the statute is to avoid a vehicle from running under it by keeping the bumper height low enough to stop it so the rule really only applies to trucks
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Do individual States set MINIMUM bumper heights for cars? I’m thinking of how many custom lowered cars there are everywhere and it appears only the ground is the limit
Kai
Halifax, N.S. ‘69 SPL311 Sports 1600
Classic Cars - Because clean fingernails, free weekends, intact knuckles and financial stability are totally overrated.
I removed my front bumper, added the BRE (?) spook, put driving lights in the bumper openings several years ago... never going back. I love the look of the car like that!