1600 rear brake shoes

General topics.

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
70rdstr1600

1600 rear brake shoes

Post by 70rdstr1600 »

I bought brake shoes from my local Autozone per the 311 parts interchangeability list. The shoes are close but, physically too small. With the adjuster turned all the way in, I can still turn the drum. I compared them to a set I removed from a parts car and discovered the difference.
Would like to hear from anyone who can help.
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5360
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Brake shoes

Post by SLOroadster »

Try taking them back and getting a set for a 240Z as they use the same rear drums as a late roadser. If the part number matches, there is a problem (on there end).
Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
User avatar
S Allen
Site Admin
Posts: 4572
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:57 pm
Location: Knoxville, IA(Lake Redrock)Emory, TX
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

RE:Rear Brake Shoes

Post by S Allen »

I would like to hear more about this so if there is a problem the interchangeability list I can fix it. Which shoes did you supposedly get that do not work? I know for a fact the early 510 shoes work as that is all I use.

Steve
66 Stroker-Going Orange
67 SRL311-00279-resto project
Stock '72 240Z-Blue
2002 Ford F250 7.3 Diesel 2WD Hauler
2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2009 Smart ForTwo Passion Coupe
2013 Fiat 500 Abarth
70rdstr1600

1600 rear brake shoes

Post by 70rdstr1600 »

I returned the brake shoes today. They were Beck/Arnley part #081-0218. The Autozone computer showed this part # for the 240Z. I checked the 510, and that produced part #081-0192. I pick those up Wednesday.
I have also found that Autozone engine part #'s are actually for the L engine. ie: valve cover gasket, fuel pump

Thanks for the help.
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5360
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Part#s

Post by SLOroadster »

The thing we must remember is that we are dealing with a car that may as well not exsist. The R16 is far more common than U20, however neither one is any near as common as an L series. The other parts tend to be the same way. :( . The brake shoe issue is strange, but not unlikely.

Just my $.02

Will[quote][/quote]
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
70rdstr1600

1600 rear brake shoes

Post by 70rdstr1600 »

Beck/Arnley part#081-0192 is the correct shoe for the rear.
Thanks.
User avatar
S Allen
Site Admin
Posts: 4572
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 4:57 pm
Location: Knoxville, IA(Lake Redrock)Emory, TX
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

RE:Rear Brake Shoes

Post by S Allen »

|Is that Beck Arnley PN for roadster or Z? Thanks.

Steve
66 Stroker-Going Orange
67 SRL311-00279-resto project
Stock '72 240Z-Blue
2002 Ford F250 7.3 Diesel 2WD Hauler
2008 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2009 Smart ForTwo Passion Coupe
2013 Fiat 500 Abarth
Crazy Backyard Builder
Roadster Nut
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 2:27 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA.

Post by Crazy Backyard Builder »

If the rear shoes interchange with the 510. Does that mean the wheel cylinders, drums, and adjuster's are interchangeable too?


Crazy Backyard Builder
70rdstr1600

1600 rear brake shoes

Post by 70rdstr1600 »

B/A part #081-0192 is for the roadster. The shoes listed for the Z were too small. I arrived at the correct shoes by ordering the ones for the 510 as suggested.

As far as the other brake parts interchanging, I'm not sure. This roadster I'm putting together is my first experience with older Datsun's. I would think the drums would interchange as long as the lug pattern is the same.

Thanks.
Post Reply