Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

eye wrote: Tue Dec 22, 2020 7:53 pm That is what hot rodding is all about. IMO. I have never left anything stock. I love original and restored to new cars and bikes, but I sure love cutting them up too. Mine was in crappy enough shape to easily go to the crusher but it still on even if it is highly modified.
There is very little room to move anything in the firewall and front floors though. It's a pretty tight fit for anything but feet.

Good luck with it.
I'm thinking a notch by the VIN tag similar to the one for the brake master might be all I need at the firewall, and possibly a notch by the upper control arm. It gets tight there with the turbo, mainly the wastegate.

With SR20DETs almost dried up something needs to take over it's role.

Here's a great picture that shows the HPFP sticking out by it's lonesome.

Image
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Here's another excellent quality image that shows the turbo.

Image
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Alvin »

Can you relocate the HPFP to avoid firewall clearance issues?

For height, dry-sump?

Width-wise, looks like you can remove the factory manifold and make one to fit/position turbo above body rail.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Alvin wrote: Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:26 am Can you relocate the HPFP to avoid firewall clearance issues? It's cam driven, so no. Maybe it can be clocked somehow.

For height, dry-sump? The Miata pan is very slim and shaves off about two inches, I don't see a dry sump gaining enough more to be worthwhile. By my estimations from trying to scale the drawing, the main engine itself would be right around 25-26" with the Miata pan, which will fit pretty well. The HPFP just adds that last 2" or so.

Width-wise, looks like you can remove the factory manifold and make one to fit/position turbo above body rail. That's probably an option. I'd really like to see it work with the stock turbo, as it means no custom tuning, but with the turbo and manifold being cast together that makes it harder to just relocate. Maybe flip it 180 degrees if not too tall?
User avatar
Pjackb
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1252
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:49 pm
Location: Montreal,Qc & Plattsburgh,NY

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Pjackb »

User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »


Well isn't that slick. I actually had a full SVO swap stashed a few months ago but I sold off everything to focus on just a couple projects I love.

I'm 90% ready to pull the trigger on the Mars swap kit. I called them and asked about cruise control, which they said isn't possible, any codes left behind on the ecu once they crack it, which he said there are but not ones that trigger a CEL. I asked about future tuning possibilities, he said just treat it as a 15-17 mustang and any canned tune will work.

$5350 shipped is a lot to swallow up front but I'm paying for convenience with a turnkey kit.
Alabama311
Forum Newb
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2020 3:21 pm
Location: Montgomery, AL
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Alabama311 »

damarble, I am also interested in this build and look forward to your trials and learn from them to hopefully follow your trailblaze. SR20 are so expense and difficult to find now. Cheers, and Happy Holidays/Merry Christmas.
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Alabama311 wrote: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:46 pm damarble, I am also interested in this build and look forward to your trials and learn from them to hopefully follow your trailblaze. SR20 are so expense and difficult to find now. Cheers, and Happy Holidays/Merry Christmas.
It might turn out to be an expensive mistake in the end but I think it's worth exploring. The few SRs left will only continue to go up in price while these should be on the way down.
JT68
Talented Enthusiast
Posts: 2922
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:43 am
Location: Cumming, GA

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by JT68 »

If you are going to do a swap, I'd definitely suggest the SR - or a KA if you can't afford the SR. Those at least have some support by Nissan enthusiasts.

SR and KA aren't THAT expensive.

Any original datsun roadster engine is probably a better choice in the long run..putting a cheap engine in the car will just further de-value it.
LT/JT
https://www.datsunrestorationproducts.com/
Only the very BEST parts for your Datsun- 10000's of items in stock
New, Used and Reproduction!
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

I went ahead and placed the order. There's about a 3 month lead time. I think further updates will be posted on my members garage thread.
User avatar
bobd
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: Lakeland, FL
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by bobd »

This thread is being documented on https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum ... 812/page1/.

Found it on https://fordauthority.com/

Looks like roadsters are going mainstream!
'69 1600 with SR20DE
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

bobd wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:23 am This thread is being documented on https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum ... 812/page1/.

Found it on https://fordauthority.com/

Looks like roadsters are going mainstream!
Oh snap!
orangedawg
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 2:36 pm
Location: Wenatchee, WA

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by orangedawg »

I wonder where that car came from? WA plates and it suspiciously looks like one that was stored in Wenatchee for years and never moved (well, I recall it being moved from driveway to carport). Never saw it driven, ever, in 35 years. Curious if same car.
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

orangedawg wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:34 am I wonder where that car came from? WA plates and it suspiciously looks like one that was stored in Wenatchee for years and never moved (well, I recall it being moved from driveway to carport). Never saw it driven, ever, in 35 years. Curious if same car.
Interesting. It ended up in Gig Harbor where I found it. I have a title printed in 71.
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Looks like it made auto evolution too haha

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/1968 ... 53723.html
Post Reply