Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Egz
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:22 am
Location: Virginia
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Egz »

I just saw that. Making quite the news
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Egz wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 5:19 pm I just saw that. Making quite the news
It was weird to see it show up in my own google news feed. I better not disappoint.
DAC21
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1110
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:44 am
Location: California
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by DAC21 »

damarble wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 12:30 pm Looks like it made auto evolution too haha

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/1968 ... 53723.html
No backing out now!
1967 1600 in waiting SPL311-09002 / R-28178
2018 Hyundai Elantra GT Sport Ultimate
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

damarble wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:36 am
orangedawg wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 10:34 am I wonder where that car came from? WA plates and it suspiciously looks like one that was stored in Wenatchee for years and never moved (well, I recall it being moved from driveway to carport). Never saw it driven, ever, in 35 years. Curious if same car.
Interesting. It ended up in Gig Harbor where I found it. I have a title printed in 71.
The address on the title is in Winslow, WA
onsight512
Site Supporter
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:39 pm
Location: in the Verdugos
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by onsight512 »

DAC21 wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 6:09 pm
damarble wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 12:30 pm Looks like it made auto evolution too haha

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/1968 ... 53723.html
No backing out now!
It'll be fun to watch you do this. If you can get that thing to fit I may consider swapping out my SR20. lol
User avatar
TurboRagtop
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by TurboRagtop »

Here’s a good piece on transplanting a Ford 2.3L Ecoboost engine into a 1968 roadster.

https://fordauthority.com/2020/12/ford- ... l-project/
Karl Payne, Gilbert, AZ
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

I just found a hero willing to extract measurements from a cad file of the NC Miata 6 speed.

Image
Image
TurboRagtop wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:25 am Here’s a good piece on transplanting a Ford 2.3L Ecoboost engine into a 1968 roadster.

https://fordauthority.com/2020/12/ford- ... l-project/
That's me.
70MTRoadster
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:36 am
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by 70MTRoadster »

I measured my xtra roadster 5 speed and get 27.5 to 28.78, 29 to 32.66 and 6 to 8.57 so the 6 sp is longer and wider for sure. And just cking out the cad drawing looks quite a bit deeper behind the bell housing too.
1968 510 Wagon
1970 Roadster 1600/U20/5 sp. swap
1972 510 4 dr. vg30e/5 sp. ricky racer
1971 510 shell behind the shop, r.i.p.

I drive a Roadster or 510 almost every day!
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

70MTRoadster wrote: Fri Jan 01, 2021 5:39 pm I measured my xtra roadster 5 speed and get 27.5 to 28.78, 29 to 32.66 and 6 to 8.57 so the 6 sp is longer and wider for sure. And just cking out the cad drawing looks quite a bit deeper behind the bell housing too.
Thanks! I was just out measuring my tunnel and I think there's a chance this thing fits with some "percussive expansion". The widest part at 8.57, which I think is the reverse gear, should sit approximately 11-12" in front of the original shifter, right under the radio. From in the car I measure around 8-9" there, with a larger bulge on the left side. If the right side was bulged to match we might have something.
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Miata pan arrived. That saves a ton of height!

Image

It effectively slices this much from the Mustang pan.

Image
User avatar
Slackline
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:16 am
Location: Clovis, CA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Slackline »

Wow.
That pan did save you a bunch of space. Great find!
Rob

66 Datsun 1600 / K24
2021 CT4-V Blackwing
User avatar
TurboRagtop
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by TurboRagtop »

Wait, a Miata oil pan fits a Ford Ecoboost? What did I miss?
Karl Payne, Gilbert, AZ
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

TurboRagtop wrote: Thu Jan 14, 2021 9:49 am Wait, a Miata oil pan fits a Ford Ecoboost? What did I miss?
The ecoboost is based off the Mazda MZR block used in 06-14 Miatas, and many other Mazdas of that era.
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

eye wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 7:48 am Plan on cutting the X fame up in 2 places to get the exhaust out the back if you go that way
A guy said on FB that you have a tubular X brace?
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Ok, some good news. The Aerostar driveshaft fits the Miata transmission splines perfectly! Except the oil seal is too big so I'll have to find the right one.
Post Reply