SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

norgebe91
Roadster Newby
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:00 pm
Location: Virginia

SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by norgebe91 »

I know a lot of people here do the Mazda rear end swap or a Ford 8" or something to that effect.

What are the pros and cons of just rebuilding the stock rear end? I want to convert it to disks brakes regardless of if I keep the stock 2000 rear end or if I go with another option. I'm mainly worried about the stock rear end being able to handle the 200-250 horsepower of the SR20DET??


Thanks
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by spl310 »

As I recall, Don Miller's VG30 turbo monster only had rear end failures when running over 300hp with 10"+ wide slicks.
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Alvin »

norgebe91 wrote:I know a lot of people here do the Mazda rear end swap or a Ford 8" or something to that effect.

What are the pros and cons of just rebuilding the stock rear end? I want to convert it to disks brakes regardless of if I keep the stock 2000 rear end or if I go with another option. I'm mainly worried about the stock rear end being able to handle the 200-250 horsepower of the SR20DET??


Thanks
You will be fine just rebuilding it, as there are plenty of DET swaps out there running the stock rear end. If you plan on adding more power or really beating on it, then consider the other options.

You mention converting to disc brakes...the other options may also include this, along with an LSD and more gearing options. These make the Ford/Mazda rear ends desirable.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
spriso
Vendor
Posts: 1629
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 9:20 am
Location: Oregon
Contact:

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by spriso »

As long as you are not doing crazy burnouts, the stock H190 will live just fine. We just upgrade to the RX-7 axle to get the LSD and rear discs.

Michael
Spriso Motorsports
http://www.spriso.com
Instagram https://instagram.com/spriso/
SR20 Powered Roadsters
Engine swap kits Available! See my website!
User avatar
silvertiger
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:29 pm
Location: South of Monterey, Ca

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by silvertiger »

Rx-7 will have better handling over a Ford rear end just on weight alone.
A wise man has the power to reason away what a fool believes.


“Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”
User avatar
RCMike
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2460
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: Pomona, CA

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by RCMike »

My only issue with the stock rear end was that the passenger tire liked to spin, a lot..
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Alvin »

silvertiger wrote:Rx-7 will have better handling over a Ford rear end just on weight alone.
curious, why and what does "handling" mean?
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
cktrap
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:56 pm
Location: colleyville,tx

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by cktrap »

Alvin wrote:
silvertiger wrote:Rx-7 will have better handling over a Ford rear end just on weight alone.
curious, why and what does "handling" mean?
Us down here in Texas understand what it say
:smt064
'70 SRL311
'10 GMC 2500HD
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by spl310 »

RCMike wrote:My only issue with the stock rear end was that the passenger tire liked to spin, a lot..
Get a limited slip, problem solved. Or don't drive so hard...
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Alvin »

spl310 wrote:
Get a limited slip, problem solved. Or don't drive so hard...
Near impossible to find an OEM LSD, and if you do it's some coin!
IMHO, a one tire-fryer doesn't add to the fun, driving "hard" or not!
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by spl310 »

Why does it have to be OEM? OS Giken
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
RCMike
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2460
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:58 pm
Location: Pomona, CA

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by RCMike »

spl310 wrote:Get a limited slip, problem solved. Or don't drive so hard...
I mean sure.. But would there be any point to the significant work and money difference in building a turbo powered car and then say don't spin up the turbo? I regularly spun the wheel with an NA powered SR..

The OS piece would probably work perfectly. They make great stuff. Then again, some of the members on this forum are regularly breaking the stock axles with U20 power. So who knows..
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Alvin »

spl310 wrote:Why does it have to be OEM? OS Giken
It does not. But at that price point, $1500 just for an OS Giken LSD, a full bolt-in Mazda unit with disc brakes and a LSD makes sense.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
Mattk
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 694
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:49 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Mattk »

I went with the rx-7 rear for the LSD. I just really wanted semi lucid hallucinations of being a skilled driver :D
MattK
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: SR20Det with stock 2000 rear end??

Post by Alvin »

charlee0620 wrote:I went with the rx-7 rear for the LSD. I just really wanted semi lucid hallucinations of being a skilled driver :D
LSD and "hallucinations"...they go hand in hand!
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
Post Reply