Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
redroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2624
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
Location: KCMO
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Post by redroadster »

spl310 wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:01 am The oil IS being slung off, but it is effectively a rope and is inducing drag on the reciprocating mass. The scraper cuts that oil off so that it effectively lightens the mass. Or so I am told...
Just as a friendly debate
That is the surface tensions aspect ...pretty minor same in the bearings
You would have a compression of air with the cranks end caps irregular shape and vacuum created passing by the plate on the back side too

Plus the plate impedes the blast of air being forced down and up the cyl
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Post by Gregs672000 »

Agreed that it's probably still a theory, and the effects of a scraper likely vary a lot with engine design/internals. Depending on what's actuality happening there does appear to be some science behind it, but an internal picture would be cool. There are some before and after dyno info on the website based on one engine I think (average 3% hp increase), but it's also not all about hp.

Well, so long as it doesn't scrape, it's in there and doing its thing (or will be soon). I would love for some show like Engine Masters to do a test.
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Post by Gregs672000 »

An update...
No rubbing! It appears I have a small oil leak at the crank but I have not investigated the source yet (previous leaks were a LOT worse). One thing for sure, engine temp is down significantly. I don't know if this is solely due to the scraper as the engine is running the best it ever has with EFI and the correct spark plug type (double platinum required) for the Ford EDIS system, but that system was operating before and my temps were not like this. Compression was dropped from 11.7 to 10.3, so that may be a reason as well. However I think it was theorized that the scraper puts the oil back into the pan better so it transfers heat better. Cooler oil was a target for the 7 quart aluminum finned comp pan. Even with it, my engine has always run on the hotter side. Not anymore.

I call that a win so far! If I notice anything else I'll post it.
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Post by spl310 »

Excellent news!
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: Has anyone tried this scraper in your engine?

Post by Gregs672000 »

I just caught the final few minutes of Engine Masters Season 3 episode 3 about "How oil kills horse power" where they found 20hp loss with too much oil and gained 8hp with simple pan changes (I didn't see the whole episode, just the last couple minutes). This occurred at higher rpm and they talked about what they might expect with a better "windage tray" or adding a crank scraper. They also said the oil had a lot fewer air bubbles trapped in it which improved its protection.
In my experience so far, my engine temps continue to be lower and it cools off faster. Again, I do not know if this is due to the scraper or better fuel ratio control, but something changed it.
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
Post Reply