Transmission Mounting -- What shear load?

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
JFBrink
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Transmission Mounting -- What shear load?

Post by JFBrink »

Hey, there,

I want to use a pair off-the-shelf industrial vibration isolators to mount my Miata transmission to the crossmember, but I am really uncertain as to what load range I need to be in.

Does anyone have an idea of what the shear load ratings for an OEM or aftermarket transmission mount would be?

I'm guessing high -- I can imagine the torque being translated into a significant lateral shear motion. But, I may be totally wrong about this.

Anyone have any thoughts (and/or data) on this matter?

Thanks,

Jesse.
User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5038
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Trans mount

Post by fj20spl311 »

WHY?

Just go to PEP BOYS and get a "universal" GM, Ford, Dodge..... trans mount.

They should have a trans mount that can easily be modified to fit for $10-$20. Just ask to look at the pictures.

That's what I did for my FJ trans.

Phil
User avatar
ppeters914
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 3125
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Lake Forest Park, WA (just north of Seattle)
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Post by ppeters914 »

...or the Energy Suspension GM mount that Dave "I'm doing dizzies now" Brick showed would work for a regular roadster tranny.
Pete
-------------------------------------
'67 1600 - frame off started in 2014. Now I know why roadster projects take so long. What a stupid idea. :smt021
'66 1600 - parts car
'66 WPL411 ***SOLD***
A couple of Porsches, a RAV4 Hybrid, and a motorcycle
JFBrink
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by JFBrink »

The "why" is twofold.

One is that I've already drilled my holes through the x-member and they don't match universal mounts. I actually had a nice solution using the stock Roadster tranny mount, turned upside down, but I made my template while sleep-deprived by my new-born and ended up drilling to the wrong dimensions. For a variety of reasons, I cannot drill new holes.

Two is that the Universal, GM, Ford and even Roadster mounts all push the Miata transmission up very high, because they are now sitting on top of the x-member, creating a significant pinion angle.

Cylindrical industrial vibration isolators solve both problems.

So... any thoughts on shear loads?

Thanks,

Jesse.
User avatar
nomadtrash
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Krum, TX

Post by nomadtrash »

There isn't a lot of load in the tranny mount. Almost all the load goes through the motor mounts. The tranny mount just keeps it from bouncing around back there. Just about anything you put back there will work fine.
Andy Cost
Roadster-less

Bolt on modification? I did use some bolts!
User avatar
datsunrides
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 7:15 pm
Location: Roseburg, Or

Post by datsunrides »

Wouldn't shear be more fore and aft? I think the trans mount works in tension/compression (up/down) for the most part. If you can get vibration isolators with 5/16" studs, that should more than suffice. May want to get a couple if the rubber used in them reacts badly with oil or make sure they are rated for contact with oil. Hell, you could probably get away with some old swaybar bushings if you wanted to be real frugal.

Mark
1966 Roadster
Turbo / EFI U20 (T25 w/ SDS EMU.)
Post Reply