The thread on Rover/Buick V8's got me going... Has anyone seriously looked at the GM LS series (LS1, LS2,... LS7) V8's?
If one really wants an Alum. V8 the GM is a much better engine than the Rover. (I know, GM invented the Rover/Buick V8 back in the day, I'm aware of the pedigree)
With the LS, you get 6 bolt mains, all alum. construction, modern ignition, displacement on demand, (4,6,8 cyl modes of operation), transmission choices galore, yadda yadda. My brother put 300,000 miles on one of these engines, and only changed oil and spark plugs; he reports terrific durability, traded it in and went and bought another one.
Getting one to fit may be a challenge, but not much more difficult than the GM V6 we all know of.
Anyone know of this being done? Anyone take a serious look at the LS?
I wonder how much it weighs compared to the Rover/Buick?
Aluminum V8's - Options
Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68
- TurboRagtop
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Aluminum V8's - Options
Karl Payne, Gilbert, AZ
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
- spl310
- Roadster Guru
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
- Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!
I saw a Roadster that someone was squeezing an LT1 into a Roadster. If I recall correctly, they had to remove virtually all of the firewall and the transmission tunnel to get it to fit and then rebuild it all around the engine. The footboxes were tiny when they were done. I bet it was quick though!
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little
1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
- Dave
- Turbo Powered
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 12:24 am
- Location: In the refrigerator, to the left of the mayonnaise, behind the pickles and beer.
Anything's possible with enough cutting and welding. Some of the 240SX guys are starting to pull out their blown up SR20s/KA24s and drop in LT1s. Same with the 3rd gen RX7 guys. The engine is a tight fit into the 240sx which has a MUCH larger engine bay than the roadster.
Dave Kaplan
68 2000 Roadster - Now with GT2560R power!
SR20-DET: 223 rwhp, 222 lb-ft.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/698904
68 2000 Roadster - Now with GT2560R power!
SR20-DET: 223 rwhp, 222 lb-ft.
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/698904
- dbrick
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 10084
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey
I believe the Rover is 280 pounds complete ready to run. Biggest reason for the Rover choice is cheap, available and I think lighter than the 4 cyl coming out. Money being no object, the GM LS would be nice. If I really could have what I wanted in there, it would be a Daimler Hemi with a
4-71 or Hilborn injection, but they are a bit rare, or a nice straight 6. The SR20 and Zetec are very cool, I just like the Rover it's aV8, it's lighter than stock engine I can put a 5 or 6 speed behind it and I can do carbs or injection with cheap factory parts. Oh, and it looks really cool too.
4-71 or Hilborn injection, but they are a bit rare, or a nice straight 6. The SR20 and Zetec are very cool, I just like the Rover it's aV8, it's lighter than stock engine I can put a 5 or 6 speed behind it and I can do carbs or injection with cheap factory parts. Oh, and it looks really cool too.
Dave Brisco
Take my advice, I'm not using it"
66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit