Ever seen the rods of the 4 banger cycle engines they are half of car rod plus the flywheel tiny
Hp what's that.? What it the torque #s
Transmission Swap
Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68
- redroadster
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2624
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
- Location: KCMO
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: Transmission Swap
Last edited by redroadster on Sun Jul 02, 2023 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
-
- Roadster Fanatic
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:41 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: Transmission Swap
Yeah they are much lower torque and high rpm. This is more of a why not experiment that may actually work 

-
- Roadster Fanatic
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:41 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: Transmission Swap
Interesting. Will read up on that motor. For now going with the Hayabusa 1300.
Daryl Smith wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 10:52 pm Don't know about rpm wise, but.... there is the 2.3 Litre, 3 cylinder Triumph motorcycle engine......![]()
From Wikipedia:
"Rocket III Roadster
The 2010 Roadster is the most powerful bike in the Rocket III line-up, with a claimed 163 lb⋅ft (221 N⋅m) torque and 146 bhp (109 kW) power, as well as a dual exhaust, one per side, instead of the previous 2 and 1 layout. Triumph calls it "the ultimate muscle streetfighter".[18]
Or... just the "Rocket 3" - 2458 cc @ 165 hp (6,000 rpm) and 163 ft/lbs (4,000 rpm):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_Rocket_3
Maybe this one..."Rocket 3 TFC" - 179 hp @ 7,000 rpm
https://www.triumph-motorcycles.ca/moto ... cification
Hard to believe they make motorcycle engines that big......![]()
- redroadster
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2624
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
- Location: KCMO
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: Transmission Swap
Delete
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
- TurboRagtop
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 8:15 pm
- Location: Gilbert, AZ
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Re: Transmission Swap
Torque is the concern here, at least for me.
My alleged math indicates 178 HP at 10,000 RPM will give 94 lb-ft of torque. That’s a bit less than a 2000 making 135 HP.
The real question is what is the shape of the torque curve?
IOW, where does it peak? (At what RPM?)
Remember that torque is the only thing that can be physically measured. Horsepower is just a calculated value; HP is (T*RPM over 5252)
What that means is what you really feel as the car pulls hard through the gears… is torque.
My alleged math indicates 178 HP at 10,000 RPM will give 94 lb-ft of torque. That’s a bit less than a 2000 making 135 HP.
The real question is what is the shape of the torque curve?
IOW, where does it peak? (At what RPM?)
Remember that torque is the only thing that can be physically measured. Horsepower is just a calculated value; HP is (T*RPM over 5252)
What that means is what you really feel as the car pulls hard through the gears… is torque.
Karl Payne, Gilbert, AZ
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
1966 1600 roadster, 2.3L EFI Turbo Ford engine, FMIC, 2.5" exhaust, T-5 trans, 300ZX big brakes, stand-alone Megasquirt ECU/TunerStudio
-
- Roadster Fanatic
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2021 10:41 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: Transmission Swap
Hi. I believe it's a higher end torque curve. It's more of an experiment than something reasonable 
I have done V8 swaps/builds my whole life so wanted to try something new that revs super high.
I will probably look at the honda k24 or some of the other similar options if it doesn't work out.
Also I am getting a 1600 motor at some point to maybe go original or have the option at least.
Will see

I have done V8 swaps/builds my whole life so wanted to try something new that revs super high.
I will probably look at the honda k24 or some of the other similar options if it doesn't work out.
Also I am getting a 1600 motor at some point to maybe go original or have the option at least.
Will see

TurboRagtop wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:24 pm Torque is the concern here, at least for me.
My alleged math indicates 178 HP at 10,000 RPM will give 94 lb-ft of torque. That’s a bit less than a 2000 making 135 HP.
The real question is what is the shape of the torque curve?
IOW, where does it peak? (At what RPM?)
Remember that torque is the only thing that can be physically measured. Horsepower is just a calculated value; HP is (T*RPM over 5252)
What that means is what you really feel as the car pulls hard through the gears… is torque.