DELETED
Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68
-
spl310
- Roadster Guru
- Posts: 13215
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
- Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!
If you want to fit down below the windshield, a high windshield car (68 - 70) is your best bet. It can be done in a low windshield, but may take some work.
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little
1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
-
Ausdat
- Roadster Newby
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:26 am
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
I'm 6' 1'' and with a high screen 2000 the top of the windscreen has never been an issue.
I did drive a low screen 1500 for 300km's recently and that was a different story altogether. Aside from the lower screen the seat didn't go as far back as my 2000 so I ended up with what felt like my knees around my shoulders. Anything under 60km/h head over the screen, anything over 60 scrunch down. I was amazed at how different a car it was to drive since visually it doesn't appear that different to a 2000.
How did that MGC handle with that big heavy six cylinder hanging over the front suspension?
I did drive a low screen 1500 for 300km's recently and that was a different story altogether. Aside from the lower screen the seat didn't go as far back as my 2000 so I ended up with what felt like my knees around my shoulders. Anything under 60km/h head over the screen, anything over 60 scrunch down. I was amazed at how different a car it was to drive since visually it doesn't appear that different to a 2000.
How did that MGC handle with that big heavy six cylinder hanging over the front suspension?