Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

General topics.

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by theunz »

While looking at the 67.5 2000 currently on BAT I noticed a difference between his OEM plate and the reproduction plate now on his car, in particular the spacing between the ENGINE and the NO on the left hand side, as well as the spacing between CAR and NO. There is a bigger gap on the OEM than the reproduction. The one’s on Dean’s site have the smaller gap like his reproduction. With everything else looking correct on the reproduction’s, it seems odd that that one spacing is off. There are also some other minor spacing issues.
Could there be variances between some of the years?
Are all the blank plates reproduction, or were some available from Datsun?
How long have they been available?

First picture is his reproduction
Second picture is his OEM
Third picture is mine that was on my car when I bought it in 1972
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by spl310 »

There are variations. The ID plates were available from Nissan. They were available in English, Spanish, Left hand drive, Right hand drive, 1500, 1600, 2000, SU, Solex, etc. There was even a plate for the French Market cars....
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by spl310 »

I have seen variations on the 1500 ID Plates used. The very early 67 2000s had the model for year line - later cars did not have that.
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by theunz »

Sid, I’m aware of the differences for models and countries as well as Solex vs SU carbs. I’m just curious if the differences I pointed out were just a lack of attention to detail on the reproduction plates or if Nissan changed suppliers at some point and their spacing was a little off. Thanks for all the minutiae however.

Would be interesting to see a sampling of OEM plates from different years.
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by spl310 »

I pointed out that many variations were available from Nissan because some folks think that only the 150hp plate was available over the counter, and that isn't the case. I have seen variances from year to year with regards to spacing and font details. I have not kept the examples. Some make absolutely no sense, but it is what it is.
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
devo
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 551
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:58 pm
Location: Texas
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by devo »

My original Spanish plate for comparison:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by theunz »

Thanks for posting Devo. Looks like the worker who stamped yours had a little more pride in his work than the guy who did mine or the one on BAT🥺
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
User avatar
rwmann
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 6:11 am
Location: Port Washington, NY
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by rwmann »

I’m told the repro plates are stamped after downing a dozen or so strong sakes, to mimic originals?
DAC21
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:44 am
Location: California
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by DAC21 »

Anyone found a stamp set which has the rather distinctive No. 3 ?
1967 1600 in waiting SPL311-09002 / R-28178
2018 Hyundai Elantra GT Sport Ultimate
User avatar
datsun1500
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1342
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:24 pm

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by datsun1500 »

DAC21 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:12 pm Anyone found a stamp set which has the rather distinctive No. 3 ?
The Harbor Freight ones do.
I remember when no one wanted the 1500s......
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by theunz »

DAC21 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:12 pm Anyone found a stamp set which has the rather distinctive No. 3 ?
Why bother? I count at least 6 discrepancies between the OEM and the reproduction plates.
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
DAC21
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:44 am
Location: California
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by DAC21 »

theunz wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 9:34 pm
DAC21 wrote: Sun Jul 11, 2021 8:12 pm Anyone found a stamp set which has the rather distinctive No. 3 ?
Why bother? I count at least 6 discrepancies between the OEM and the reproduction plates.

Trying to keep it under 7 😛
1967 1600 in waiting SPL311-09002 / R-28178
2018 Hyundai Elantra GT Sport Ultimate
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by theunz »

LOL😂
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
User avatar
Curtis
Site Supporter
Posts: 4164
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:49 pm
Location: Des Moines, WA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by Curtis »

What about having the original plate screened over? Then you'll have the original sloppy numbers.
66 stroker, almost done.
67 basket case, paint coming soon.
User avatar
Mattk
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 694
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:49 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Vin Plate OEM vs Reproduction

Post by Mattk »

Curtis wrote: Mon Jul 12, 2021 12:16 am What about having the original plate screened over? Then you'll have the original sloppy numbers.
Now thats a cool idea! Has that been done already?

I think keeping/having the original sloppy stamps would cool!
MattK
Post Reply