The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68
- mraitch
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 3629
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Lake Balboa (SFV) - CA
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
- Contact:
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Re air scoop, black but not sure whether satin/flat or gloss!
Peter Harrison
1970 1600 (Stroker) - TOAD SAN (Eliza)
1970 1600 (Stock) - As Yet Unnamed
Lake Balboa (SFV) , California
1970 1600 (Stroker) - TOAD SAN (Eliza)
1970 1600 (Stock) - As Yet Unnamed
Lake Balboa (SFV) , California
-
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Thanks, I will take the liberty of painting it gloss like the frame and front suspension then.mraitch wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:14 pm Re air scoop, black but not sure whether satin/flat or gloss!
located in Chester NH
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
- Nissanman
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 3452
- Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:07 pm
- Location: Adelaide, South Australia
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
- Contact:
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Here is the Trico assembly I used for my low windshield SP310:-
Sorry,
that isn't what you asked!
Sorry,



You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Nissanman, just trying to help.
1965 SP310 Engine No. G-93326 Car No. SP310-10817
https://photos.shutterfly.com/album/60141836519
On the road again!
1965 SP310 Engine No. G-93326 Car No. SP310-10817
https://photos.shutterfly.com/album/60141836519
On the road again!
- 2mAn
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2238
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
- Location: Westchester, CA
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there†chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
- Curtis
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 4164
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:49 pm
- Location: Des Moines, WA
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Someone chromed it?2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there†chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
66 stroker, almost done.
67 basket case, paint coming soon.
67 basket case, paint coming soon.
- ppeters914
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 3125
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: Lake Forest Park, WA (just north of Seattle)
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
DELETED
Last edited by ppeters914 on Fri Jan 04, 2019 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pete
-------------------------------------
'67 1600 - frame off started in 2014. Now I know why roadster projects take so long. What a stupid idea.
'66 1600 - parts car
'66 WPL411 ***SOLD***
A couple of Porsches, a RAV4 Hybrid, and a motorcycle
-------------------------------------
'67 1600 - frame off started in 2014. Now I know why roadster projects take so long. What a stupid idea.

'66 1600 - parts car
'66 WPL411 ***SOLD***
A couple of Porsches, a RAV4 Hybrid, and a motorcycle
-
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there†chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Since the valve cover is one of the outermost parts of your whole car, I suggest that you skip it for now and get on with the higher priority things first.
located in Chester NH
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
- Gregs672000
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Yes, agreed with above... don't be the guy that says "Its better to look good than to feel good...". Nothing makes a Roadster look better than a shift from second to third at 6500rpms...
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
- Linda
- Fraternal Den Mother-RIP
- Posts: 7807
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:37 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Back to the grease, Simon..lol
Linda
Linda
Sadly-Linda has passed away 2022. She was the 311's den mother and drove the first Rare-Parts ball joint project. RIP.
- 2mAn
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2238
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
- Location: Westchester, CA
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
The cylinder head is about to come off and get shipped to a machine shop... dont worry, Im getting quite greasy.
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
- Gregs672000
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 9428
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Make sure that you number the rockers so they go back on the exact same lobe on the cam!!!!!!
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
- 2mAn
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2238
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
- Location: Westchester, CA
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
I will, but the cam and those rockers arent going back on this headGregs672000 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:33 am Make sure that you number the rockers so they go back on the exact same lobe on the cam!!!!!!

Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
- theunz
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 2469
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
- Location: Catoosa Ok.
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Simon, are you sure it's chrome? Unusually if someone changes the appearance of the valve cover its either polished or painted. I have never heard of someone chrome plating one. A highly polished peice of aluminum will look just like chrome. If it is indeed chrome than the dirt and discoloration should wipe off without much effort. If you get some aluminum polish and try it on the bad areas and they come back to life than its most likely just polished. If you determine that it is polished than you can either repolish or try getting it bead blasted. Don't use sand, as that will leave a rough finish. even the bead blasting will leave it a duller than stock appearance and it will probably get dirty pretty quick. The easiest way would be to either bead blast it ( or hand sand it) and then paint it. If you have access to a large ceramic tumbler that would probably be able to achieve the closest stock appearance. The problem with polishing aluminum, especially when it resides in harsh and dirty conditions, is that it will have to receive regular maintenance. If you blast, or hand sand, be absolutely certain that no debris gets on the inside of your valve cover. And, as others mentioned, concentrate on the important things first! The asthetics can be addressed later. Good luck moving forward.2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there†chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Mike M
Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!
1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!
1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
- 2mAn
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 2238
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
- Location: Westchester, CA
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Im pretty sure its chrome... it wouldve been done in the 70s/80s prior to the car being parked in '87


Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
- Pjackb
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:49 pm
- Location: Montreal,Qc & Plattsburgh,NY
Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2
Rub some polish on it with a cloth (any polish really) if it turns black after a while it’s polished if it only cleans without turning black it’s coated2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:07 pm Im pretty sure its chrome... it wouldve been done in the 70s/80s prior to the car being parked in '87