The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Locked
User avatar
mraitch
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 3629
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Lake Balboa (SFV) - CA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70
Contact:

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by mraitch »

Re air scoop, black but not sure whether satin/flat or gloss!
Peter Harrison
1970 1600 (Stroker) - TOAD SAN (Eliza)
1970 1600 (Stock) - As Yet Unnamed
Lake Balboa (SFV) , California
C.Costine
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by C.Costine »

mraitch wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:14 pm Re air scoop, black but not sure whether satin/flat or gloss!
Thanks, I will take the liberty of painting it gloss like the frame and front suspension then.
located in Chester NH
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
User avatar
Nissanman
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 3452
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:07 pm
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Nissanman »

Here is the Trico assembly I used for my low windshield SP310:-


trico wiper arm a103 a104.jpg


Sorry, :oops: :oops: :oops: that isn't what you asked!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Nissanman, just trying to help.
1965 SP310 Engine No. G-93326 Car No. SP310-10817
https://photos.shutterfly.com/album/60141836519
On the road again!
User avatar
2mAn
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2238
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
Location: Westchester, CA
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by 2mAn »

I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there” chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
User avatar
Curtis
Site Supporter
Posts: 4164
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:49 pm
Location: Des Moines, WA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Curtis »

2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there” chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Someone chromed it?
66 stroker, almost done.
67 basket case, paint coming soon.
User avatar
ppeters914
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 3125
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Lake Forest Park, WA (just north of Seattle)
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by ppeters914 »

DELETED
Last edited by ppeters914 on Fri Jan 04, 2019 5:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pete
-------------------------------------
'67 1600 - frame off started in 2014. Now I know why roadster projects take so long. What a stupid idea. :smt021
'66 1600 - parts car
'66 WPL411 ***SOLD***
A couple of Porsches, a RAV4 Hybrid, and a motorcycle
C.Costine
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 1737
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by C.Costine »

2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there” chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?

Since the valve cover is one of the outermost parts of your whole car, I suggest that you skip it for now and get on with the higher priority things first.
located in Chester NH
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Gregs672000 »

Yes, agreed with above... don't be the guy that says "Its better to look good than to feel good...". Nothing makes a Roadster look better than a shift from second to third at 6500rpms...
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
User avatar
Linda
Fraternal Den Mother-RIP
Posts: 7807
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:37 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Linda »

Back to the grease, Simon..lol
Linda
Sadly-Linda has passed away 2022. She was the 311's den mother and drove the first Rare-Parts ball joint project. RIP.
User avatar
2mAn
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2238
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
Location: Westchester, CA
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by 2mAn »

The cylinder head is about to come off and get shipped to a machine shop... dont worry, Im getting quite greasy.
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Gregs672000 »

Make sure that you number the rockers so they go back on the exact same lobe on the cam!!!!!!
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
User avatar
2mAn
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2238
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
Location: Westchester, CA
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by 2mAn »

Gregs672000 wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:33 am Make sure that you number the rockers so they go back on the exact same lobe on the cam!!!!!!
I will, but the cam and those rockers arent going back on this head :twisted:
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2469
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by theunz »

2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 1:01 am I’m fully embracing the “while I'm in there” chaos that happens when I tear a motor apart, and I’m wondering if I should strip the chrome from the valve cover or embrace it and try my best to clean it up... thoughts?
Simon, are you sure it's chrome? Unusually if someone changes the appearance of the valve cover its either polished or painted. I have never heard of someone chrome plating one. A highly polished peice of aluminum will look just like chrome. If it is indeed chrome than the dirt and discoloration should wipe off without much effort. If you get some aluminum polish and try it on the bad areas and they come back to life than its most likely just polished. If you determine that it is polished than you can either repolish or try getting it bead blasted. Don't use sand, as that will leave a rough finish. even the bead blasting will leave it a duller than stock appearance and it will probably get dirty pretty quick. The easiest way would be to either bead blast it ( or hand sand it) and then paint it. If you have access to a large ceramic tumbler that would probably be able to achieve the closest stock appearance. The problem with polishing aluminum, especially when it resides in harsh and dirty conditions, is that it will have to receive regular maintenance. If you blast, or hand sand, be absolutely certain that no debris gets on the inside of your valve cover. And, as others mentioned, concentrate on the important things first! The asthetics can be addressed later. Good luck moving forward.
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
User avatar
2mAn
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2238
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2017 5:02 pm
Location: Westchester, CA
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by 2mAn »

Im pretty sure its chrome... it wouldve been done in the 70s/80s prior to the car being parked in '87

Image
Simon
Current Cars:
-1999 Porsche 911 4/98-build, 3.8L M96
User avatar
Pjackb
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1300
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:49 pm
Location: Montreal,Qc & Plattsburgh,NY

Re: The Quick/Small/(Stupid?) Question Thread-take 2

Post by Pjackb »

2mAn wrote: Thu Jan 03, 2019 2:07 pm Im pretty sure its chrome... it wouldve been done in the 70s/80s prior to the car being parked in '87
Rub some polish on it with a cloth (any polish really) if it turns black after a while it’s polished if it only cleans without turning black it’s coated
Locked