Comparisons between a U20 and a R16

General topics.

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
67 1/2 1600

Comparisons between a U20 and a R16

Post by 67 1/2 1600 »

I was thinking of getting a U20 but like always I can never make my mind up. Just curious on the comparisons of what differences you guys felt between the 2000 and the 1600 engine. Power wise etc.

Thanks!
Import_sounds-of-mid-GA

Post by Import_sounds-of-mid-GA »

i think the 30+ hp speaks for itself..... and parts from many other motors will fit. (forklift motors, I think the H20, etc)
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Post by spl310 »

The forklift motor has more in common with the R engine than the U
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
67 1/2 1600

Post by 67 1/2 1600 »

Yes since the H20 is pushrod like the r16.
Redtail

Post by Redtail »

I don't think the Datsun published horse power numbers are accurate - they quote 96 for the 1600 and 130 for the 2000 right? Anyone out there have the real numbers?

not that it matters much to me, but it'd be nice to know.
DELETED

Post by DELETED »

DELETED
67 1/2 1600

Post by 67 1/2 1600 »

Well theres a U20 that I can get for about $300 but its frozen. Complete carbs, exhaust manifold valve cover oil pan etc. It was previously rebuilt you can still see the honing on the cylinder walls. But doing a add up on how much U20s are to rebuild would be pricy to have this one rebuilt again. But if I can free it and have it working then why not! I enjoy my 1600 with the 4spd, but was just curious if it would be a good idea to put a u20 in the car. However what makes me not want to do it is that my engine has less than 5,000 miles since the rebuild so why pull it? I cant make my mind up.
DELETED

Post by DELETED »

DELETED
User avatar
shifty
Roadster Enthusiast
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Post by shifty »

I'm really happy with my U20 with SU's. It's been a long time since I've driven a 1600, so it's hard to make a comparison, but the 2-liter has plenty of low-end grunt. It's quicker off the line than my 1.6L Miata. It really starts to pull around 3500. I haven't had it up to redline yet.

The 5-speed is great for freeway travel.

I've got a line on a set of Solexes, so I hope to report on the diffference soon!
Leigh Brooks

http://www.shiftco.com - my blog about cars (and stuff)
Latest post: http://www.shiftco.com/radios/the-test-mule/

67.5 SRL-00139 sleeping
67.5 SPL-11481 suspended animation
67.5 SPL-12961 snoring
67.5 SPL-13622 - H20 PWR!
User avatar
dbrick
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 10084
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey

Post by dbrick »

There's 20 years between these two cars, but my 1600 5 speed was overall very nice to drive. I went from a 340 Dodge Dart to the Datsun and wasn't whining, so it must have been pretty OK. My 2000 is great but a little more rear end gearing would be nice. On paper/benchracing/off thetop of my head, I'd say an H20 or 1600 with 2000crank, 5 speed and HS6 carbs would be the hot ticket, both performance and dollar wise.

Dave Brisco

Take my advice, I'm not using it"

66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit
steve68

Post by steve68 »

just find a h20 short block, get you r16 head ported, get a set of solexs or go to efi (same price i would think) get the cam reground...boom past the 2000 (stock su of course)

Steve
Post Reply