Vinyl or Canvas?

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
User avatar
23yrRebuild
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1071
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 2:19 pm
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Vinyl or Canvas?

Post by 23yrRebuild »

What are the opinions on vinyl versus canvas soft tops?
Last edited by 23yrRebuild on Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
Mike - '67 Stroker / 5-Speed
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13215
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Post by spl310 »

That question should get a few folks talking!! From a historic perspective, the tops on the Roadsters through 67 were black canvas. From 68 through the end of production, they were vinyl. There is some question in my mind about what the 67.5s would have had - I have not had an original top with any of my cars, but I suspect that they were canvas.

For a concours typ restoration, you would need to get the oem type material. For you, that would be cloth. For practicality, vinyl is easier to keep nice looking on a car that is a driver. Some folks advocate the zip out rear window, (not original on any Roadster, but available aftermarket), but others think that it adds to much to the bulk if you use the boot.

Vinyl is also less expensive than canvas...
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
User avatar
DatsunBucky
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 665
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Taylorsville, UT

Post by DatsunBucky »

spl310 wrote:There is some question in my mind about what the 67.5s would have had - I have not had an original top with any of my cars, but I suspect that they were canvas.
From what my failing memory tells me about my original Roadster, they were the same material as the tonneau cover and the boot. Canvas.
Bucky
Post Reply