Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5038
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by fj20spl311 »

Mike Unger wrote:Folks,

You don't want the front of the spring lower than the rear (whoops not front sorry for the typo)! This induces bump steer. Don't go there, this is not a good idea...

Mike
Don't all rear leaf spring suspensions have bump steer? If the spring has an arc, its going to get longer the more it compresses, if its flat or reverse arced its going to get shorter.

The front mount is pretty much fixed. If you lower the rear, don't you increase the Moment arm by lowering the Moment center? Do you want more roll in the rear?
Phil
67.5 SRL311-00148 Blue (FJ cruiser VOODOO Blue)
67.5 SPL311 FJ20E teal SDS EFI
69 SRL311 SOLD
19 Raptor SCAB
User avatar
Mike Unger
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Gloucester Point, VA

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by Mike Unger »

I'm interested in a car that handles best (as close to neutral as possible) in all conditions of travel. Drag racers and circle track racers have different goals. Circle track racers will actually use bump steer to help the car turn in at a corner. You want the axle to move front to rear as little as possible during travel. To accomplish this you want the spring level. Look at the arc that the axle must go through during spring movement. When you go around a corner one side compresses and the other side extends, think about what happens to axle placement when this occurs. I prefer as little movement as possible.

Mike
Mike Unger
User avatar
dbrick
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 10084
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by dbrick »

If you do a search for Pinto, you can go to page 93. No pics, but the text is there. Explains how a level spring induces less roll steer.http://www.amazon.com/How-Make-Your-Car ... 0912656468

Dave Brisco

Take my advice, I'm not using it"

66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit
User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5038
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by fj20spl311 »

Mike Unger wrote:I'm interested in a car that handles best (as close to neutral as possible) in all conditions of travel. Drag racers and circle track racers have different goals. Circle track racers will actually use bump steer to help the car turn in at a corner. You want the axle to move front to rear as little as possible during travel. To accomplish this you want the spring level. Look at the arc that the axle must go through during spring movement. When you go around a corner one side compresses and the other side extends, think about what happens to axle placement when this occurs. I prefer as little movement as possible.

Mike
Mike,
I do not know that much about the suspensions.

Can you please tell us what you have found with respect to the rear suspension?

Do you think it would be best to run comp (flat) springs, 66 springs or some thing else?
Have you lowered the rear mounting location? Do you run lowering blocks?
How about "traction" bars? Lowers or uppers?
Do you run a Panhard Bar or watts linkage?. Where are you location points? Below the axle, inline with the axle. Is the bar level or angled.

Any Pictures?

Thanks,
Phil
Phil
67.5 SRL311-00148 Blue (FJ cruiser VOODOO Blue)
67.5 SPL311 FJ20E teal SDS EFI
69 SRL311 SOLD
19 Raptor SCAB
User avatar
Mike Unger
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:58 pm
Location: Gloucester Point, VA

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by Mike Unger »

"I do not know that much about the suspensions."

Check out the book that Dave mentioned. It's very good.

"Do you think it would be best to run comp (flat) springs, 66 springs or some thing else?"

The different springs will change the spring rate and ride height but not geometry much. It depends on your goals. Our street car has a completely stock rear suspension and Comp front springs. I like that for the street just fine. My SCCA race car has a coil over link suspension. The vintage race cars have Comp rear springs. Travel can get pretty limited with the comp springs because the axle will hit the frame. If your on the bump stop then that becomes your spring rate. That will induce snap oversteer as the spring rate goes towards infinity. I wouldn't put them on a street car.

"Have you lowered the rear mounting location? Do you run lowering blocks? "

Yes, for a race car it is a good idea to lower the rear mounting point. The lowering blocks just change ride height. See Dave's link.

"How about "traction" bars? Lowers or uppers? "

Not a big factor for a road race car with rolling starts, in my opinion. You have to be careful that these don't bind up the suspension at travel if you add them. The stock one on the later cars is OK if the mount is in good shape.

"Do you run a Panhard Bar or watts linkage?. Where are you location points? Below the axle, inline with the axle. Is the bar level or angled. "

Yes, a Panhard bar is a good idea on a race car. You want it level at rest and pretty low and very rigid and as long as possible. You want it level at rest so it reduces bump steer problems with travel. It moves through an arc and therefore steers the rear of the car. That's why you want it level at rest and long. The frame mount needs to be beefy and well braced because it will be long to get the bar low and therefore have some leverage on it. Make the mounting points adjustable so it can be changed to level with ride height changes or to tune handling. I have one chassis with a clever Watts link on it but never drove the car. A panhard bar is simpler and easier to adjust roll center.
Mike Unger
User avatar
Datsunparts.com
Vendor-Site Supporter
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by Datsunparts.com »

F
Last edited by Datsunparts.com on Fri May 04, 2012 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dbrick
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 10084
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by dbrick »

As Mike mentioned, if you are cornering on the bumpstops, it can be very dangerous. Any further load on the suspension will transfer directly to the frame and suddenly unbalance the car. I run very low comp springs on the street with soft shocks, GR2's, but I don't push the car to extremes. I do need to get newer, shorter, softer and/or progressive bumpstops at both ends.

Just to be sure, you can use a tire crayon or chalk on the bumpstop or frame and see if you get transfer. The solution is smaller softer bump stops, more spring rate, or more ride height. you also need to make sure the rear shocks aren't too long and still have some travel at full bump.

Now oddly enough, my totally stock 2005 Dodge Ram has about 1 inch of clearance at the front bump stops and looks like it hits very regularly. I guess they didn't read the book.

Dave Brisco

Take my advice, I'm not using it"

66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by jamesw »

I still need to get around to posting some photos of my car w/ the mono-leafs installed - and measure the hub to fender lip height.

Cheers
James
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
CSP311
Site Supporter
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Uk
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by CSP311 »

I have been following this thread with interest... I could not see this info on here, which I got from a Volvo forum.

Rear leaf springs from 1984;
340 part no. 3201759
360 (excluding GLT) no. 3205441
360 GLT no.3201761
360 (Heavy duty) no. 3284425 (standard Aus.)

You may have to drop the prefix 3, as it seams the rest of the number is stamped on, but not the 3.
1965 Nissan Silvia (CSP311) for total restoration
1978 260Z finally on the road (Rebello 3.2L)
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5361
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by SLOroadster »

I'm getting my car pretty well sorted out now. I added about 60lbs of lead as ballast to the trunk and with a full tank of fuel, the car is perfectly neutral on the track. It gets more tail happy as the fuel burns off, but its far better with the weight added back.

I rode in a street car with comp front springs, monoleafs in the back with Bilsteins (cut down), and it was amazing. The ride was smooth and controlled even on some bumpy back roads. The damping was a little soft for track use, but for the street it was spot on.

Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by jamesw »

What are the Volvo part numbers for? Are the Volvo rear leafs an interchange to the roadster?

Cheers
James
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5361
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by SLOroadster »

jamesw wrote:What are the Volvo part numbers for? Are the Volvo rear leafs an interchange to the roadster?

Cheers
James
The Volvo parts are what the rear leafs start as, they must be cut down and rerolled to work on a roadster. Its not a direct fit.

Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5361
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by SLOroadster »

I got a nice present last week in the form of 2 sets of lowering blocks and a new set of U bolts. The blocks are 33mm tall and 45mm, I went straight to the 45mm ones. I also found a broken U bolt, good thing I got a new set. All I can say is wow, what a difference it made to the way the car feels and handles. The 60lbs of lead in the trunk that could barely be felt is now VERY noticeable. I'll bet I'm taking some out. Even with my worn out street tires the back end feels like it sticks better. It feels more positive under braking and almost feels like it might understeer if pushed through a corner. (I haven't tried yet, just took it for a short run around the block.) If nothing else, it looks better, the stance is perhaps a little taller than with comp springs, but not as tall as stock springs.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
User avatar
gboone
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 360
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70
Contact:

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by gboone »

I got my composite springs recently and started the install today. Much less arch than the steel monoleafs and they weigh only 6 pounds each. That negates the weight I added with my new roll bar. Flex Form found an old die for me in one of their drawers, tested it, and it worked well. I may have to add lowering blocks but they'll be pretty thin. We'll see after I install one and sit it on the ground.
Gary Boone
1970 SRL311
S15 SR20DET w/6 speed swap in progress
Image
User avatar
SLOroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5361
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
Location: Napa Ca

Re: Single leaf rear springs. (longish post)

Post by SLOroadster »

gboone wrote:I got my composite springs recently and started the install today. Much less arch than the steel monoleafs and they weigh only 6 pounds each. That negates the weight I added with my new roll bar. Flex Form found an old die for me in one of their drawers, tested it, and it worked well. I may have to add lowering blocks but they'll be pretty thin. We'll see after I install one and sit it on the ground.
I'll bet you have to add some weight to the back end. I'm guessing that I'll end up pulling 20 lbs out of the car, or running a half tank of fuel to get the balance right. It would be nice to loose more, but I don't think its going to happen. With your springs that are half the weight of mine, you will likely have to add more weight than I do to get it balanced right. Time will tell. I'd love to put my car on a set of corner weight scales, I just don't happen to have any.

Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
Post Reply