ROTA RB - New Photos

Tires and rims is always coming up. Discuss these item here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5038
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by fj20spl311 »

jamesw wrote:Well guys - getting back on topic - I think my wheels are too big or have the wrong offset for the front
Any suggestions from the wheel-heads out there? Should I swap the fronts (now have +12) for some +30 offset? That will bring me in by 18mm...

Other suggestions (good ones) are to get the car aligned and get some negative camber to correct for the suspension drop.

Cheers
James
I don't like the look of +30 wheels, so I don't think that's a option. LOL

Option 1: Set the negative camber
Option 2: Roll the fenders
Option 3: New or machined hubs with a different off set.
Option 4: Change A-Arms

I would try option 1 first. The car looks too low to me. How much travel do you have before the tie rod hits the frame?
Phil
67.5 SRL311-00148 Blue (FJ cruiser VOODOO Blue)
67.5 SPL311 FJ20E teal SDS EFI
69 SRL311 SOLD
19 Raptor SCAB
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

I'm going to try option 1 and option 5 (get taller springs).

Cheers
James
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by Alvin »

-another option would be to run a lower profile tire and/or a narrower width
Going from the the 195/55-series to a 195/50 series would give another 1/2" of clearance!

Are these the"regular" comp springs?
do you have any pics of the car all 4 wheels on the ground?

ps more static camber will not help judging by how much the tire sticks out past the fender, any pics of that?

When the wheel is at full lock, that is when the worst rubbage will occur.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

Thanks for the advice Alvin.

Well I'm also working on Option 6 - which is to lower the back of my car back down to a reasonable height in hopes of leveling it out a bit. So I got one of the mono-leafs installed tonight. What a b***h that is btw. But I got one done.

Alvin, the tires and even the wheels stick out enough that I just don't know. I'd say w/ the 195's I'm running they only stick out a few mm past the rim. See a few pages back in this post for a straight down shot.

Once I get both of the mono-leafs installed (w/ 1" lowering blocks) and all four wheels back on the ground I'll get some more pix.

Cheers
James
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by Alvin »

james i'll wait for pics, it does look cool though :D I am excited for you!
lowering the back still doesn't help front clearance
If you have access to a machinist, tell them to take 10mm off the mounting pad, this will bring the wheel inward, are you okay with mis-matching wheels?

i still think the 55-series on this wheel size/ride height is too much tire up front, try the 50, dial in some camber and it should clear
if that still doesn't work, the +25 and +20 wheel have the same lip and better fitment.

make the springs work! i think one of the sexiest parts of the roadster is that front fender flare...so don't rub too hard or that pretty lip will be marred :lol:

Image
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
bmccarthy67
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 401
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 11:38 pm
Location: Savannah, GA

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by bmccarthy67 »

I have 50s on the same wheels and they seem to fit on my daily driver (but my springs are not that low)...they are actually on my 67.5 resto now. There is certainly plenty of meat on the rear of these wheels to remove a few mm to move the rims in, but as you know you will have to modify the hole even more to fit over the hub. Now that I've seen yours I may have a few mm taken off the rear just to be safe. Thanks for keeping us informed about this wheel option James.

Image

v/r
Buddy
http://www.mydatsun.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
67.5 SRL311-00321
67.5 SPL 2000 Transplant
66 SCCA Project
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

Thanks for the feedback guys.

I finished putting in the mono-leafs tonight. You can see a comparison shot of my re-arched stock leafs vs the mono-leafs. Exact same height - meaning the spring rate on the monoleafs is MUCH less. I really like them btw, I took her for a spirited drive after the install to "settle me - er I mean them down."

Here are some pictures of the rear fender gap, the stance, etc. Better but still a little too low in front for my taste. But VERY close.

Cheers
James
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

One more just for fun :-)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8381
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by Alvin »

is that with the lowering blocks installed?

I'd put your stock front springs back on to match the rear height

are the front springs, regular or "super" comp springs?
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
notoptoy
Vendor-Site Supporter
Posts: 9700
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:55 pm
Location: Winston-Salem, NC and Ocala, FL
Contact:

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by notoptoy »

I don't know if it's because the front is so low, but the back in that configuration looks too high for my tastes. thanks for the comparison of the stock (though re-arched) to the new mono leafs, it's a nice reference, do you have any more shots?
"When all else fails, force prevails!" Ummm, we're gonna need a bigger hammer here.

67.5 SPL311 H20 w/5 speed
65 Impala Convertible
2017 C43 AMG
User avatar
spl310
Roadster Guru
Posts: 13241
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 10:38 pm
Location: In front of this keyboard... in Jacksonville, Florida!

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by spl310 »

For a street car, (at least around here where potholes and speed bumps abound) the front looks a bit too low. It is tough to gauge the rear with the front that low. Personally, I like a taller sidewall, but I know that is not what most of the folks on here like...
"Wow, a Roadster!" Stuart Little

1967.5 2000
1967.5 2000
1964 1500
1964 1500
1967.5 1600
1968 chassis
2006 Acura MDX
2013 Volkswagen Jetta TDI wagon
1995 F350 Powerstroke!
More...
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

Yes - the lowering blocks are installed. They basically make the springs the same 'thickness' as the stock springs. Ride height in back has dropped about an inch which to me is perfect.

Ride height in front is too low (sorry Alvin ;-) ) I have ordered some of Mike Youngs springs which are taller but with 860 lb/in rate which seems right to me.

I'll post some more photos Tom but not sure how useful since they are not 'stock' rears vs. mono-leaf.

Cheers
James
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
zippy67roadster
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:43 pm
Location: Cameron, Texas
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by zippy67roadster »

jamesw wrote:Yes - the lowering blocks are installed. They basically make the springs the same 'thickness' as the stock springs. Ride height in back has dropped about an inch which to me is perfect.

Ride height in front is too low (sorry Alvin ;-) ) I have ordered some of Mike Youngs springs which are taller but with 860 lb/in rate which seems right to me.

I'll post some more photos Tom but not sure how useful since they are not 'stock' rears vs. mono-leaf.

Cheers
James
Let me know if your looking to sell the comp springs you have on now.
1967 Datsun SPL311-08935-vintage race car
1967 Datsun SPL311-10123 project
1967 Datsun 411 wagon
67.5 SPL311 Vintage Race car project
64 NL320 Pickup Truck
Brian
http://www.sincitydatsuns.com
https://www.facebook.com/sincitydatsuns
jamesw
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2760
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:06 am
Location: Houston TX

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by jamesw »

Front ride height is perfect w/ the Mike Young comp springs. Back is still a bit high w/ the mono-leafs. They come w/ a 1" lowering block that makes the spring/block combo the exact same thickness as the stock spring "stackup." I am investigating using a 2" block instead - but that means I need to get longer U-bolts, etc.

Cheers
James
SRL311-00275
'96 Porsche 993 C4
2001 Excursion 7.3l
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9428
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: ROTA RB - New Photos

Post by Gregs672000 »

Longer U-bolts are not a problem or expensive to have made at a spring shop. Don't waste your time trying to find them on the internet... I had no success in finding the proper (stock) bolt thickness in the size I needed, and I looked A LOT.
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
Post Reply