RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Post by Alvin »

hmmm...I just dug through my e-mail and Gordon Glasgow said that the rear NISMO leafs are rated at 207 lb/in.
If fronts are 860 lb/in than what do you think?
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5009
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

Spring Rate

Post by fj20spl311 »

IMHO you want the effective spring rate to be close front to rear.

The springs in the front have a ratio of something like 3:1 because the act on the A-arm, so the effect spring rate would closer to 290 lb/in.

Phil
User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Post by Alvin »

Thanks!!
I didn't know about the lever effect, so mounting the coil-overs at different angles will change spring rate?
What is the best angle, Guy Selle's (on first page) looks liek they are mounted upright.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Post by Alvin »

edit:
I found this spring rate calculator for mounting coil-over angle:
http://www.type1r.com/misc/calc/springrate/index.html

So we should be shooting for a wheel rate close to 290lb/in?
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
fj20spl311
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 5009
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: San Diego, Ca

rear spring rate.

Post by fj20spl311 »

IDN what will be the best spring rate.

I would use the "Spring Rate Calculator for Independent Suspension" on the web site you referenced to calculate the effective spring rate for the 860 lb/in comp springs. I also remember seeing a spring rate calculator for front to back using the wheelbase as one of the parameters. I think the HP also has some bearing on the rear spring rate...more HP requires a higher spring rate.

You do the work and we will all gain. LOL

Phil
User avatar
nomadtrash
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Krum, TX

Post by nomadtrash »

I measured my front wheel rate at 190 lb/in. I am using 860 pound comp front springs. I added a bunch of weight on the cross member and then measured the amount of sag in the ride height. Although the roadster may be about 50/50 static you will have some dynamic weight variables that make a front rate higher than the back preferable. Most notable is the roll front roll center which is lower than the rear. This causes the rear to lift a tire in the corners because the rear rolls more than the front. If you monkey with the roll centers in the front or rear you can end up with some funky handling issues. I think Bill and Elliot had issues with a front tire that would come off the ground around corners. That is what can happen with a rear roll center lower than the front (panhard bar too low), soft rear springs, and a really stiff front swaybar. Bill and Elliot did win a lot of races so that may be the fast way around the track.
Andy Cost
Roadster-less

Bolt on modification? I did use some bolts!
User avatar
dbrick
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 10084
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey

Post by dbrick »

Phil is correct, I should have said "effective" spring rate, or wheel rate. There is a book by Fred Puhn, "how to make your car handle" Old school, pre computer, has all the math and explanations. Changing the spring rate at one end effects the other, as the front suspension is sort of the "pivot" for the rear and vice versa; this is where the wheelbase comes into play. If you have multiple positions to mount the coil overs, you can get a variety of different wheel rates from the same spring by varying the leverage. All the roll center stuff, while important, gives me a headache. Best thing I can say is have a big open parking lot and a light breakfast.the first time you push the suspension to the limits, may be a whole different driving car.

It's alot of trial and error. I'm with Phil, when you guys have the answers, I'll try it :lol:

BTW,Is it colder at the polar moment of inertia?

Dave Brisco

Take my advice, I'm not using it"

66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit
64roadster

Re: disc brakes and an lsd.

Post by 64roadster »

why not go for broke?

http://www.bryanf.com/510/rsusp.htm

I know its a 510 but with a little help it would work.
User avatar
RC240z
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1005
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:14 pm
Location: Sunny Oceanside CA
Contact:

Post by RC240z »

Andy my car is set up that way, and for a relatively "stock" suspension it is a fast way around the track, as I have picked up 5 seconds over my previous best at California Speedway.

Softer rear springs, Panhard rod, and the removal of the aftermarket rear swaybar. The other part of the equation is a "locker" style differential.
67.5 2000, SRL 311 000305 Solex
A race car since new!
Instagram #RC240Z #geoskyalert


check out my blog at www.rcnetworksracing.com
User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Post by Alvin »

Update:
In-progress pics
still need to install coil-overs and re-do exhaust(clearance is tight now!)
RX-7 axle before narrowing
Image
Image

Fuel Tank modified for in-tank pump:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Narrowed axle with brackets mounted:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Removing stock suspension, welding in brackets for upper/lower links:
Image
Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Sold NISMO leafs and stock axle assembly:
Image

Links hanging:
Image
Image

Links mounted:
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by Alvin on Sat Nov 03, 2018 3:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
nomadtrash
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 456
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Krum, TX

Re: RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Post by nomadtrash »

You should seriously consider a stronger upper frame mount that supports both sides of the bar that the heim joint engages. A four link changes the load direction from up and down to push pull. There will be an enormous amount of load on that bracket.
Andy Cost
Roadster-less

Bolt on modification? I did use some bolts!
User avatar
kogi
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 12:11 pm
Location: socal
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: rear spring rate.

Post by kogi »

fj20spl311 wrote:
You do the work and we will all gain. LOL

Phil

WOW!!!! that's wicked :shock:
nice project alvin... so do you have a test dummy to work out the bugs :smt004
ken
66 spl311
san marcos, ca
User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Post by Alvin »

quick video showing the links moving though it's travel:
Last edited by Alvin on Fri Feb 01, 2019 12:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
dieter ka24de
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 101
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:54 pm
Contact:

Re: RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Post by dieter ka24de »

What springs did you end up with ?
User avatar
Alvin
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 8284
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: RX-7 Rear Suspension Project

Post by Alvin »

QA1 street coilovers,
getting exhaust done tomorrow will update with pics
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
Post Reply