Rear brake shoe install help needed

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
User avatar
printner
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Rocky Mountain High

Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by printner »

Installing the rear brakes today. I think I have them correct, but the pad labelled "Fore" is actually at the back and the one labelled "After" is in the front. Because of the rectangular hole, I believe this has to be correct. Can anyone confirm?

Thanks!
brakes.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
67.5 1600 stroker in progress
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by theunz »

If those shoes were on the other side of the car would that correct the orientation?
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
Doggggboy
Roadster Nut
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:18 pm
Location: Saskatchewan
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by Doggggboy »

On most older cars the short shoe goes at the front of the drum, the larger one goes at the back, if I remember correctly.
User avatar
theunz
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 1:54 pm
Location: Catoosa Ok.
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by theunz »

Interestingly enough,the friction area of both of those shoes seem to be the same.
Mike M

Old enough to know better, too old to remember why!


1969 2000 solex mine since 1972, under resurrection. (Finally resurrected as of spring 2019!)
1969 Porsche 911s -worth more, but not as valuable! Gone!
2017 Lotus Evora 400 - Oh my!!
Doggggboy
Roadster Nut
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 11:18 pm
Location: Saskatchewan
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5
Contact:

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by Doggggboy »

Well then, I'll just go back to reading my book and drinking my wine.
That was all I had.
If the other side is still assembled you could compare and contrast.
You're sure you don't have two back pads on the same side? One pad is usually smaller than the other but looking at Datsunparts.com pictures of pads they DO seem indentical. Is one pad thicker maybe?
I'm totally clutching at straws now.
The Neck
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:36 pm
Location: Denver, CO
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by The Neck »

I think the rear one with the square notch is correct, but the one on the front or the left in the pic, needs to be flipped upside down.

I'm basing this off of having just did mine, and I believe this flip will give a more uniform pad surface area with a much smaller gap in pad along the bottom as seen in that pic.
1968 CJ-5
2007 Audi S4
2003 Audi Allroad Stg 2
1967.5 1600
User avatar
nismou20
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: Pasadena, Ca

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by nismou20 »

Yours are mounted the (other way). It will work but not as efficient as having the shoes exactly 180 degrees apart. You will notice that the gaps between the shoes are different. Notice top left at adjuster the shoes are closer than bottom right where the shoes are spread wider apart. Yes, one has to be flipped.
2004 Chevy Tracker
2010 RAV4
1969 Datsun Roadster
2005 Lotus Elise
1995 Toyota Tercel (Poormans Corolla)
2001 Fleetwood Jamboree RV
User avatar
dynaguy
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:27 pm
Location: Colton, Wa

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by dynaguy »

Hi Tim,

I just installed shoes on my '66. Took before pic, orientated shoes the same as what I took off. I used 510 shoes, but pads are the same as originals. That said, your front shoe needs to be flipped, as others have stated.
Hope this helps,
Pat
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
printner
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:40 am
Location: Rocky Mountain High

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by printner »

Thanks all. Pat, did you use the 510 part number in the tech wiki???

I had been using this as a guide, and it just didn't seem right:
brakes.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
67.5 1600 stroker in progress
User avatar
dynaguy
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1217
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 3:27 pm
Location: Colton, Wa

Re: Rear brake shoe install help needed

Post by dynaguy »

That pic doesn't jive with my before pic of original shoes. I went with how the "pad" material was orientated on the metal shoe to get the friction area the same as OEM ones. The shoes have the pad material in different locations, though the metal part appears to be identical. Took me awhile to wrap my head around why one side was different than the other side even though I had the square openings down by the wheel cylinder. Which is how they should be.
I had misgivings about buying the shoes through an auto parts outlet, so I purchased from one of our vendors.

Hope this helps.
Pat
Post Reply